Sunday, December 22, 2013

Contribution to Political Parties – section 182 of Companies Act, 2013

Section 182 of the Companies act, 2013 which has been notified with effect from 12th September 2013 provides for prohibitions and restrictions regarding political contributions. Salient features of this section are given below:
  1. All companies except Government companies and companies in existence for less than 3 years are covered by this section; 
  2. The maximum amount that a company can contribute towards a political party in a year shall not exceed 7.5% of its average net profits during the three preceding financial years; 
  3. Before making the contribution, the Board should approve of the same by way of resolution passed at its Board meeting;
  4. Subscription, donation or payment made to a person who is carrying on such activity which affects public support for a political party shall also be deemed to a contribution to a political party;
  5. Expenditure incurred directly or indirectly by a company on a publication, souvenir, journal, pamphlet for or on behalf of a political party shall also be construed as making a contribution to a political party;
  6. Every company should disclose in its profit and loss account any amount contributed to a political party in any financial party, giving the particulars of the total amount contributed and also name of the political party;
  7. If a company makes a contribution in contravention of the provisions of section 182, then the company shall be punishable with a fine which shall not be less than 5 times the amount so contributed and also every officer in default is liable to imprisonment for a term which may extend to six months and also fine of 5 times the amount so contributed. 
  8. Political party means a party registered under section 29A of the Representation of People’s Act, 1951

Ministry of Corporate Affairs has issued a clarification vide its circular no. 19/2013 dated 10/12/2013 that 
  1. where companies make contribution to “Electoral Trust companies” rather than directly to political parties then they need not disclose separately the amounts paid to each Electoral Trust company. It would be sufficient if a consolidated figure is mentioned in the accounts as paid to Electoral Trust Company;
  2. Companies making contribution directly to a Political Party will be required to make the disclosures as required by section 182(3) of the Act; 
  3. Electoral Trust Companies in turn should make disclosures regarding contributions made by them to political parties as required under section 182(3).

Process of merger under Companies Act 1956

Whether merger is allowed?
The Memorandum of Association [MOA] of both the companies must provide the power to amalgamate. If MOA is silent, the first step will be to amend the MOA.

Board Meeting
A Board Meeting shall be convened to consider and pass the following resolutions:
  • approve the draft scheme of amalgamation;
  • to authorize filing of application to the court for directions to convene a general meeting;
  • to file a petition for confirmation of scheme by the High Court.

Application to the Court
An application shall be made to the court for directions to convene a general meeting by way of Judge's summons (in Form No.33) supported by an affidavit (in Form No.34) The proposed scheme of amalgamation must be attached to such affidavit.

The summons should be accompanied by:
- A certified copy of the M&A of both companies
- A certified true copy of the latest audited B/S and P&L A/c of transferee company
- The application to convene meeting under s.391 (1) is required to be made to the respective jurisdictional High Court by the company concerned depending on the location of its registered office. Similarly an application for the scheme of arrangement will have to be made to the concerned High Court [HC] where the company’s registered office is situated.

Submission of copy to Regional Director [RD] of ROC
A copy of application made to concerned HC shall also be sent to the RD of the region. Although, such notice is supposed to be sent by the HC, usually the company sends it without waiting for the H.C. to send it.

Order of High Court
On hearing of the summons, the HC shall pass the necessary orders (in Form No.35) which shall include:
(a) Time and place of the meeting,
(b) Chairman of the meeting,
(c) Fixing the quorum,
(d) Procedure to be followed in the meeting for voting by the proxy,
(e) Advertisement of notice of the meeting,
(f) Time limit for the chairman to submit the report to the court regarding the result of the meeting.
Where the court observes that any of the following circumstances exist in the case of the merger it may not order a meeting when shareholders are few in number; or where the membership is restricted to a single family, HUF or close relatives; or where shareholding pattern of transferor and transferee companies is identical.

Notice of the Meeting
The notice of the meeting (in Form No.36) shall be sent to the creditors and/or all the shareholders individually (including preference shareholders) by the chairman so appointed by registered post enclosing:
(a) A statement setting forth the following:
- Terms of amalgamation and its effects
- Any material interests of the director, MDs or Manager, in any capacity
- Effect of the arrangement on those interests.
(b) A copy of the proposed scheme of amalgamation,
(c) A form of proxy (in Form No.37)(d) Attendance slip (e) Notice of the resolution for authorizing issue of shares to persons other than existing shareholders

Computation: The notice that is required to be given u/s.393 of the Act for the meeting of the members/ creditors shall be by 21 clear days notice.

Advertisement of Notice of Meeting
The notice of the meeting (in Form No.38) shall be advertised in English and Hindi Newspapers as the court may direct by giving not less than 21 clear days notice before the date fixed for the meeting. However in some instances, the 21 days period can be condoned if reasons are found justifiable.

Notice to Stock Exchange
In case of the listed company, 3 copies of the notice of the general meeting along with enclosures shall be sent to the Stock Exchange where the company is listed.

Filing of Affidavit for the Compliance
An affidavit not less than 7 days before the meeting shall be filed by the Chairman of the meeting with the Court showing that the directions regarding the issue of notices and advertisement have been duly complied with.

General Meeting
The General Meeting shall be held to pass the following resolutions:
(a) Approving the scheme of amalgamation by ¾th  majority e.g. if a meeting is attended by say 100 members holding 100 shares, the scheme shall be deemed to have been approved only when it is supported by at least 51 members holding together 750 shares amounts themselves;
(b) Special Resolution authorizing allotment of shares to persons other than existing shareholders or an ordinary resolution be passed subject to getting Central Government's approval for the allotment as per the provisions of Section 81(1A) of the Companies Act, 1956,
(c) The resolution to empower directors to dispose of the shares not taken up by the dissenting shareholders at their discretion;
(d) An ordinary/special resolution shall be passed to increase the Authorized share capital, if the proposed issue of shares exceeds the present authorized capital. The decision of the meeting shall be ascertained only by taking a poll on resolutions.

Reporting Of Result Of The Meeting:-
The Chairman of the meeting shall report the result of the meeting to the court (in Form No.39) within the time fixed by the judge or within 7 days, as the case may be. A copy of proceedings of the meeting shall also be sent to the concerned Stock Exchange.

Formalities with ROC
The following documents shall be filed with ROC along-with the requisite filing fees:
a. Form No. 23 of Companies General Rules & Forms along with the copy of Special Resolution,
b. Resolution approving the scheme of amalgamation,
c. Special resolution passed for the issue of shares to persons other than existing shareholders.

Petition
For approval of the scheme of amalgamation, a petition shall be made to the HC within 7 days (in Form No.40) of the filing of report by the chairman. If the Regd. Offices of the companies are in same state - then both the companies may move jointly to the
High Court. If the Regd. Offices of the companies are in different states - then each company shall move the petition in respective High Court for directions.

Sanction of the Scheme
The Court shall sanction the scheme (in Form No.41) on being satisfied that:
(i)The whole scheme is annexed to the notice for convening meeting. (This provision is mandatory in nature)
(ii) The scheme should have been approved by the company by means of ¾th majority of the members present.
(iii) The scheme should be genuine and bona fide and should not be against the interests of the creditors, the company and the public interest. After satisfying itself, the court shall pass orders in the requisite form. The requirement of law is permission or approval of court to the scheme. The application made by the company is to seek court’s approval to the company scheme of amalgamation and not merely ordering a meeting.
The court may order a meeting of members too. The court must consider all aspects of the matter so as to arrive at a finding that the scheme is fair, just and reasonable and does not contravene public policy or any statutory provision.

Stamp Duty
A scheme sanctioned by the court is an instrument liable to stamp duty. The stamp duty will be payable at both the states if the Registered office of the amalgamating companies are located in two different states. however an application will be made to the HC for exemption from either of the states.

Filing with ROC
The following documents shall be filed with ROC within 30 days of order:
a) A certified true copy of Court's Order
b)Form No. 21 of Companies General Rules & Forms

Copy of Order to be annexed
A copy of court's order shall be annexed to every copy of the Memorandum of Association issued after the certified copy of the order has been filed with as aforesaid.

Allotment of shares
A Board Resolution shall be passed for the allotment of shares to the shareholders in exchange of shares held in the transferor-company and to fix the record date for this purpose.

Merger and Amalgamation Companies Act 1956 and 2013

What is merger?
In merger two or more existing companies combine into one company. The transferor company merges its identity into the transferee company by the transfer of its business (assets and liabilities). The shareholders of the transferor company receive shares in the merged company in exchange for the shares held by them in the transferor company as per the agreed exchange ratio.

What is Amalgamation?
In amalgamation two or more existing transferor companies merge together to form a new company, whereby all the transferor companies lose their existence and their shareholders become the shareholders of the new company.

Who can object the scheme of merger.
As per the newly introduced Companies Act 2013 an objection to scheme of merger can be raised only by persons holding not less than 10% of the shareholding or persons holding outstanding debt amounting to not less than 5% of the total outstanding debt as per the latest audited financial statement. These provisions are intended to ensure that insignificant minority interest do not hold the majority at ransom. This will also enable a faster approval of scheme with the reduction of number of objections.


The Merger and Amalgamation [M&A] is allowed under the Companies Act [CA] 1956 vide section 391 to 394. The Companies Act 2013 contains 10 clauses i.e. from 230 to 240 regarding M&A whereas Companies Act,  1956 contained  only  7  sections  of  which  only  4  particularly  dealt  with  M&A.

Types of Mergers

Horizontal merger is the merger of firms engaged in the same line of business. 

Vertical Merger is backward or forward expansion. In a Conglomerate, there is a merger of firms engaged in unrelated businesses.

Process
High court of respective state where the registered offices of the companies are located has the jurisdiction to sanction the scheme. 

Merger of Foreign company

By virtue of Sec. 584 of Companies Act 1956 a foreign company having a place of business in India, is eligible to be merged with an Indian Co. U/s 394(4)(b) a foreign incorporated company could be a transferor company in the scheme of merger.


The Companies Act 2013 has opened doors for cross- border mergers by  allowing both ways merger subject to certain  conditions. Permission of Reserve Bank of India shall also be a pre-requisite in cross-border Mergers. The RBI is empowered in to analyze cross border mergers.


It is necessary that the law under which the foreign company is incorporated allow the foreign company to merge with an Indian Company. Merger can’t take place in case the foreign laws do not allow the foreign company to merge with Indian companyIn case a foreign company does not have a place in India the Indian courts have no jurisdiction to sanction the merger. However if the foreign co. has a branch office in India the respective court has the jurisdiction. Ever branch of a foreign company needs to register with ROC and submit returns to ROC at Delhi. Although the foreign company is filing the returns at Delhi ROC the High court of the state where the branch office is located shall have the jurisdiction over the M&A scheme and not the Delhi High court.


The Indian Company can carry forward the losses of the foreign company u/s 72A of the Income Tax act, after the merger of the foreign company with Indian company. 
Before issue of shares to the shareholders of the foreign company under the scheme the Indian company needs to get permission from RBI under FEMA for the issue of shares to NRI and must give declaration that the merged entity will not indulge in the business of Agriculture, plantation, Real estate etc.

Stamp Duty 

Only in the state of Maharashtra the order of the High court sanctioning the M&A attracts Stamp duty at the rate applicable on the Conveyance of Property. When the tranaferor and the transferee companies are located at two different states and if stamp duty is applicable at both the states the double payment of stamp duty can be avoided by applying for exemption in either state.

Income Tax Act 1961
It provides for not only carry forward and set off of accumulated losses but also un-absorbed depreciation allowance of the amalgamating company.

Saturday, December 14, 2013

Registered Valuer - Companies Act 2013

Section 247 of the Companies Act, 2013 contains provisions regarding registered valuers.
Definition (Rule 17.1):
‘Registered Valuer’ means a person registered as a Valuer under Chapter XVII of the Act.
Who can act as a registered valuer?
A person who is registered as a Registered Valuer in pursuance of Section 247 of the Act with the Central Government and whose name appears in the register of Registered Valuers maintained by the Central Government or any authority, institution or agency, as may be notified by the Central Government only can act as a registered valuer. An application for registration as valuer shall be made in Form No. 17.1 by individuals and firms and Form No. 17.2 by others, along with the fee as provided.
The following persons shall be eligible to apply for being registered as a valuer:
  • A chartered accountant, company secretary or cost accountant who is in whole-time practice, or retired member of Indian Corporate Law Service or any Indian Citizen holding equivalent Indian or foreign qualification as the Ministry  of Corporate Affairs may by an order recognize.
  • A Merchant Banker registered with SEBI and having in his employment persons having qualifications as mentioned above to carry out valuation services by such qualified persons
  • A member of the Institute of Engineers and who is in whole-time practice
  • A member of the Institute of Architects and who is in whole-time practice
5 years of continuous post membership experience is mandatory in all the above cases.
In the case of merchant banker the valuation report shall be signed by the qualified person.
For the purposes of this rule, a person shall be deemed “to be in whole-time practice”, when individually or in partnership or in limited liability partnership or in merchant banker with other persons in practice who are members of other professional bodies, he, in consideration of remuneration received or to be received:
(i) engages himself in the practice of valuation; or
(ii) offers to perform or performs services involving valuation of any assets with the object of arriving at financial value of the asset being valued; or
(iii) renders professional services or assistance in or about matters of principle or detail relating to valuation.
  • A person or entity possessing necessary competence and qualification as may be notified by the Central Government from time to time.
Where valuation by a registered valuer is required?
Any property, stocks, shares, debentures, securities or goodwill or any other assets or net worth of a company or its liabilities which requires valuation under the provision of the Companies Act, 2013 shall be valued by a registered valuer.
In the Act, specific mention about valuation by registered valuer has been made in the following Sections:
Section 62(1)(c) – Further issue of share capital, other than Rights Issue and Issue under a Scheme of Employee Stock Option.
Section 192(2) – Non cash transaction involving directors
Section 230(2) – Valuation report in case of a scheme of compromise or arrangement with creditors or members
Section 236(2) – Purchase of minority shareholding
Section 281(1)(a) proviso – Submission of report by company liquidator
Section 305(2)(d) – Declaration of solvency in case of proposal to wind up voluntarily
Section 319(3)(b) – Power of Company Liquidator to accept shares, etc., as consideration for sale of property of company.
Methods of valuation
  • Before adoption of the methods of valuation, the registered valuer shall decide the approach to valuation based upon the purpose of valuation:
(a) Asset approach;
(b) Income approach;
(c) Market approach
  • The valuer shall consider the following points while undertaking valuation
(a)Nature of the business and the History of the Enterprise from its inception;
(b) Economic outlook in general and outlook of the specific industry in particular;
(c) Book value of the stock and the financial condition of the business;
(d) Earning capacity of the company;
(e) Dividend –paying capacity of the company;
(f) Goodwill or other intangible value;
(g) Sales of the stock and the size of the block of stock to be valued
(h) Market prices of stock of corporations engaged in the same or a similar line of business;
(i) Contingent liabilities or substantial legal issues, within India or abroad, impacting the business;
(j) Nature of instrument proposed to be issued, and nature of transaction contemplated by the parties.
  • Methods of valuation:
(a) Net asset value method – represents the value of an entity’s assets less the value of its liabilities
(b) Market Price method: Under this method the current price at which the subject of valuation is bought or sold in the market between unrelated third parties is taken into account;
(c) Yield method / Profit Earning Capacity Value (PECV): Under this method the value is calculated by capitalizing the average of the after tax profits for the preceding three years (or such other period. Provided adequate justification is available for choosing another period) at capitalisation rates specified in the report
(d) Discounted Cash Flow Method (DCF): This method expresses the present value of the business as a function of its future cash earnings capacity.
(e) Comparable Companies Multiples Methodology (CCM): This Method uses the valuation ratios of a publicly traded company and applies that ratio to the company being valued (after applying appropriate discount or premium, as the context may require).
(f) Comparable Transaction Multiples Method (CTM) – entails valuation on the basis of similar transactions among unrelated parties in the peer group companies.
(g) Price of Recent Investment method (PORI) – entails valuation on the basis of recent investment received in the company from an independent investor.
(h) Sum of the parts valuation (SOTP) – where each part of the business is valued according to method(s) appropriate to that business, and the results are summed up to obtain total value of the business
(i) Liquidation value – if the value is being calculated in a liquidation scenario
(j) Weighted Average Method – Under this method the weights are assigned to the values calculated under different valuation approaches.
(k) Any other method accepted or notified by the Reserve Bank of India, Securities and Exchange Board or Income Tax Authorities.
(l) Any other method(s) that the valuer may deem fit to adopt in the given circumstances of the case, provided that adequate justification for use of such method(s) (and not any of the methods above) must be included in the report.
  • A registered valuer shall make a valuation of any asset as on valuation date, in accordance with the applicable standards, if any, as may be stipulated for this purpose.
For the purposes of this rule, ‘valuation date’ means the date on which the estimate of value is applicable. It may be different from the date of the valuation report or the date on which the investigations were undertaken or completed.
Appointment of registered valuer [Section 247(1)]:
The registered valuer needs to be appointed by the audit committee or in its absence, by the Board of Directors.
Duties of Registered Valuer [Section 247(2)]:
(a) make an impartial, true and fair valuation of any assets which may be required to be valued;
(b) exercise due diligence while performing the functions as valuer;
(c) make the valuation in accordance with such rules as may be prescribed; and
(d) not undertake valuation of any assets in which he has a direct or indirect interest or becomes so interested at any time during or after the valuation of assets.
Contents of Valuation Report
The report of valuation by a registered valuer shall be as near to and shall contain such information as set out in Form No. 17.3.
Conditions that lead to cessation as "Registered Valuer"
Where any person who is registered as a valuer under section 247 or who has made an application for registration as a valuer under that section is, at any time thereafter,—
(a) sentenced to a term of imprisonment for any offence; or
(b) found guilty of misconduct in his professional capacity by any association or institute or other body of which he is a member or with which he is registered;
he shall immediately after such conviction or finding, intimate the particulars thereof to the Central Government, institution or agency with which he is registered as a valuer and cease to act as valuer unless
  • permitted by the Central Government, institute or agency with which he is registered as a valuer, or
  • the order imposing penalty/sentence has been stayed by competent authority.
In case valuer is found guilty of professional misconduct or otherwise by the Institute of which he is a member or by NFRA or where the SEBI removed the registration of the merchant banker, such valuer shall cease to be the valuer automatically and their name shall be removed from the register of valuer unless such order has been stayed by the Competent Authority.
Any ongoing assignment of such valuer, who has ceased to be a valuer, shall be assigned to other valuer from the panel maintained by Central Government or any authority or institution to complete the assignment, if no stay is granted on such appeal, if any.
Removal and restoration of names of valuers from register
Removal:
The name of a registered valuer can be removed from the register by the Central Government if the government is satisfied –
  • that his name has been entered in the register by error or on account of misrepresentation or suppression of a material fact
  • that he has been convicted of any offence and sentenced to a term of imprisonment or has been guilty of misconduct in his professional capacity which, in the opinion of the Central Government or any authority, institution or agency, renders his name unfit to be kept in the register.
  • that his performance is such that his name should not remain on the register of valuers, satisfied, after giving that person a reasonable opportunity of being heard and after such further inquiry, if any, as it thinks fit to make.
The Central Government or any authority, institution or agency may appoint one or more competent persons as enquiry officer(s) for conducting an enquiry as referred above. The officer(s) conducting an enquiry shall have the same powers as are vested in a Civil Court under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 while make an enquiry and he may also call upon such experts from the field of law, economics, business, finance, accountancy, international trade, management, technology or such other discipline as he deems necessary to assist him in conducting the enquiry.
Appeal:
A registered valuer aggrieved by an order passed for removal of name may prefer an appeal in accordance with the procedure laid down in the respective Acts, regulations or bye-laws governing the respective professional. An appeal against the order of the Central Government shall be preferred to the Tribunal.
Restoration:
The name can be restored on sufficient cause being shown to the satisfaction of the Central Government.
Penal Provisions [Section 247(3) & (4)]:
  • If a valuer contravenes the provisions of this section or the rules made thereunder, the valuer shall be punishable with fine which shall not be less than Rs. 25,000/- but which may extend to Rs. 1,00,000/-.
  • If the valuer has contravened such provisions with the intention to defraud the company or its members, he shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to 1 year and with fine which shall not be less than Rs. 1,00,000/- but which may extend to Rs. 5,00,000/-.
  • Where a valuer has been convicted as above, he shall be liable to—
(i) refund the remuneration received by him to the company; and
(ii) pay for damages to the company or to any other person for loss arising out of incorrect or misleading statements of particulars made in his report.

Sunday, December 01, 2013

Duties Responsibilities and Liabilities of auditors as per Companies Act 2013

As per Companies Act 2013, Section 139 provides for appointment of auditors, Section 143 deals with powers and duties of auditors, Section 144 deals with certain services which an auditor cannot render and Section 145 is on signing of audit report and other documents by auditor. 

Penalties towards non compliance by Auditor:
Auditor shall be punishable with fine which shall not be less than Rs. 25,000/- but which may extend to Rs. 5,00,000/-. If an auditor has contravened such provisions knowingly or willfully with the intention to deceive
the company or its shareholders or creditors or tax authorities, he shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to 1 year and with fine which shall not be less than Rs. 1,00,000/- but which may extend to Rs. 25,00,000/-.
Convicted auditor shall refund the remuneration received by him from the Company and pay for damages to the company, bodies or authorities or to any other persons for loss arising out of incorrect or misleading statements of particulars made in his audit report.

Penalty for failure to disclose fraud
As per Section 143(12), if in the course of the performance of his duties as auditor has reason to believe that an offence involving fraud is being or has been committed against the company by officers or employees of the company, Auditor shall immediately report the matter to the Central Government. In case of any failure on his part to comply with this duty, he shall be punishable with fine which shall not be less than Rs.1,00,000/- but which may extend to Rs. 25,00,000/-.

Penalty for professional misconduct
National Financial Review Authority [NFRA] shall have power to investigate, either suo motu or on a reference made to it by the Central Government into the matters of professional or other misconduct committed by any member or firm of chartered accountants, registered under the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.
 
Where professional or other misconduct is proved, NFRA shall have the power to make order for 
 imposing penalty of 
  • not less than Rs. 1,00,000/-, but which may extend to five times of the fees received, in  case of individuals; and 
  • not less than Rs.10,00,000/-, but which may extend to ten times the fees received, in case of firms;
 Debarring the member or the firm from engaging himself or itself from practice as member of the Institute of Chartered Accountant of India referred to in clause (e) of sub-section (1) of section 2 of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 for a minimum period of 6 months or for such higher period not exceeding 10 years as may be decided by the NFRA.
 
Action in case of fraud by auditors

Change of auditors by NCLT:
  • The NCLT either suo motu or on an application made to it by the Central Government or by any person concerned, if it is satisfied that the auditor of a company has, whether directly or indirectly, acted in a fraudulent manner or abetted or colluded in any fraud by, or in relation to, the company or its directors or officers, it may, by order, direct the company to change its auditors. Such an auditor, shall not be eligible to be appointed as an auditor of any company for a period of 5 years from the date of passing of the order and the auditor shall also be liable for action under section 447. 
Disqualification for appointment as auditor:
  •  A person who has been convicted by a court of an offence involving fraud and a period of 10 years has not elapsed from the date of such conviction shall be disqualified to be appointed as auditor of any company.
Any person who is found to be guilty of fraud, shall be punishable u/s 447 with imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than 6 months but which may extend to 10 years and shall also be liable to fine which shall not be less than the amount involved in the fraud, but which may extend to 3 times the amount involved in the fraud.

Liability of firm: Where, in case of audit of a company being conducted by an audit firm, it is proved that the
partner or partners of the audit firm has or have acted in a fraudulent manner or abetted or colluded in any fraud by, or in relation to or by, the company or its directors or officers, the liability, whether civil or criminal as provided in this Act or in any other law for the time being in force, for such act shall be of the partner or partners concerned of the audit firm and of the firm jointly and severally.
 
Companies Act 2013 has introduced Class Action Suits:
  • Any 100 or more members/deposit holders of the company or 10% of the total number of members/deposit holders of the company can file a class action suit to claim damages or compensation or demand any other suitable action against the auditor in the manner prescribed under Section 245 of the Companies Act 2013. Action under this section can be initiated against the auditor including audit firm of the company for any improper or misleading statement of particulars made in the audit report or for any fraudulent, unlawful or wrongful act or conduct.
 
Where the members or depositors seek any damages or compensation or demand any other suitable action from or against an audit firm, the liability shall be of the firm as well as of each partner who was involved in making any improper or misleading statement of particulars in the audit report or who acted in a fraudulent, unlawful or wrongful manner.

PROCEDURE OF INCORPORATION OF A PRIVATE LIMITED COMPANY IN A SIMPLE WAY (IN LAYMAN LANGUAGE)

Steps in incorporating a company

For incorporating a private limited company, there must be:
  • At Least 2 Promoters: Promoters who will promote/ incorporate the company. Promoters may be individual or body corporate. AND
  • At Least 2 Directors: Directors should be individual only. No Body corporate/ HUF or Partnership Firm can be appointed as Directors. For this the individuals will apply for DIN i.e. Director Identification Number in Form DIN 1 along with affidavit of Rs. 10 (Depending upon the stamp duty rates of the States) as an attachment along with PAN card copy and address proof (Driving Licence/ Passport copy/ Voter ID Card/ Electricity Bill/ Telephone Bill) which should either be self attested by Individual or notary attested. This DIN 1 has to be certified by the Professional i.e. CA/ CS/CMA who will certify that the documents attached arethe true copies of the original documents and the photo attached is of the individual who is applying DIN and that individual is known to such Professional or has come to him along with the original documents. The DIN will have then to be applied and will get approved on the basis of Certification of Professional as if correct information is being filed.
Promoters and Directors may be the same.

At least 1 director must have DIGITAL SIGNATURE. This Digital Signature has to be affixed on all the E Forms i.e. Form 1A, Form 1, Form 32 and Form 18 required for incorporation of Company.

Then the promoters should apply for the name of the company to be approved with the concerned ROC of the State where the company has to be formed in E Form 1A by payment of Rs. 1000 through Credit Card or Net Banking, describing the capital of company, main objects, state in which the company is to be incorporated and to affix the digital of Applicant. The promoter can apply for 6 names amongst which the ROC will approve only 1. If the ROC rejects all the names, the applicant have another two chances to apply the name again with the same fees he has incurred while filing Form 1A.

After the name is approved, the Directors/ promoters are to draft MOA and AOA. In MOA, the 5th clause mainly i.e. Name Clause, Registered Office Clause, Main Object Clause, Capital Clause and Subscribers Clause will have to take into consideration. And in Articles all the bye laws of the company corresponding to Companies Act, 1956 have to be considered. The names of First Director are mandatory to be given in AOA.


5. These MOA and AOA should be followed by the tables of subscribers to be signed by subscribers in their own handwriting along with the shares to be subscribed by them before any person who will act as witness and will sign in the witness column that the subscribers have signed in his presence. The word subscribers here used is because of the reason that these subscribers will subscribe for the shares in the company at time of incorporation and will invest the minimum capital i.e. Rs. 1, 00, 000. They will contribute the amount by way of cash or cheque when the company gets incorporated and shares will be allotted to them followed by the share certificates


6. After the MOA and AOA are drafted, Director will take the Professional Service i.e. from CA/ CS/ CWA to incorporate the company. Professional Service is mandatory as for incorporation, E Forms 1, 18 and 32 are to be filed which are to be Digitally signed by any One Director followed by Digital Signatures of Professional who certify that all the documents and information is correct one.


7. Form 1, 18 and 32 are to be filed online after the MOA and AOA are drafted. The E Forms have been described as follows:


E Form 1: In such form, the Director is to give declaration that he is going to incorporate the company and the information filled is true and to the best knowledge to him. Information entered in E Form 1 is: The Authorised and Paid up capital of the company, Particulars of Promoters along with information of at least 2 Directors, The information about the companies in which such promoters are already acting as directors, The Stamp Duty fees to be paid and to attach the scanned copies of MOA and AOA along with their tables, duly signed by all the directors


E Form 32: In this E Form, the applicant is to give information about the first Directors of the company i.e. email id etc along with their


(i) DESIGNATION i.e. Director/ Additional Director/ Managing Director


(ii) Category i.e. Promoter/ Professional/ Independent/ Chairman/ Executive Director/ Non Executive Director


This E Form 32 is then digitally signed by one Director followed by signatures of Professional who will give verification that the appointed director has given declaration to the company that he/ she is not disqualified and not declared as an offender by any Court. The attachment in case of Private Limited Company in form of consent by Director to act as Director is optional but it is better to attach the same.


E Form 18: The Applicant is to give here the office address as well as nearby police station address. Here the Applicant is required to attach the scanned copies of Rent Agreement for the office in case the office is taken on rent OR NOC from the person/ entity if the office is not taken on rent. The Proof of registered office address is mandatory which can be electricity bill/ telephone bill on any individual name but must be of that building where the office is to situate exhibiting that the building is in existence and not a fake one. This documents is to be digitally signed by the Director followed by Professional certifying that he has visited the particular address given in E Form 18 and verified the same.


8. The Applicant will then make the payment of Government Fees as well as Stamp Duty Fees through Credit Card or Net Banking after the E Forms are filed if the Government Fee is less than Rs. 50, 000 and can pay by challan to be deposited in bank if the fee is more than Rs. 50, 000. The E Forms then will be checked by the ROC at their level. And will approve if found all the information in order or may not approve if require some extra information or of the information is not in order. Then the applicant is to give that information and to file the necessary documents if requisite E Form 61 or to re-submit the forms if any form is not found in order.


9. If the E Forms are found to be in order and gets approved by ROC,Certificate of Incorporation will be generated and will be dispatch online at the email id of the person/ entity given in the e forms.


10. The Directors are to get the MOA AOA printed and to comply all the compliances after the company gets incorporated.


Conclusion: Hope this above article will serve the purpose of incorporation of the Private Limited Companies for those Individuals/ Professional/ Business Man who does not find the required matter/ detailed Practical information etc. over the internet or somewhere else.

Hindu Undivided Family

Hindu Undivided Family [HUF] 

HUF can be formed with only Female Members 
After the Amendment in the Hindu Succession Act, in 2005, a Hindu Widow and her unmarried daughter(s) can constitute a HUF, even when the widow had not adopted a son since, daughter is also a coparcener.

An HUF is similar to joint property owners. HUF consists of lineally descended persons -like Great Grand father, Grand father ,father, uncle, son etc. All these persons have right over common ancestral property by birth. The dictum that once Hindu undivided family always Hindu undivided family” has been accepted all along.

As per Income-tax Act HUF is similar to a joint family which may consist of a single male member and widows of deceased male members. In Dr Prakash B Sultane v CIT ([2005] 148 Taxman 353) the Bombay High Court held that the property does not lose its character merely because at one point of time there was only one male member or one co-parcener.

In this case , the assessee was a doctor by profession assessable in his hands as an individual. The assessee was a member of a bigger Hindu undivided family which was partitioned on January 1, 1972. At the time of partition and right up to January 22, 1980 the assessee was a bachelor. During these years, the income from assets on partition was assessed in his hands as his individual income. When the assessee got married on January 22, 1980, he claimed that the income from assets received on partition is assessable under the status of HUF consisting of himself and his wife. The Assessing Officer observed that the decisions referred to by the assessee were considered in the judgment of the Madhya Pradesh High Court in CIT v. Vishnukumar Bhaiya (142 I.T.R. 357). Relying upon this judgment, he rejected the application of the assessee and continued to assess his income from the Hindu undivided family property in his individual capacity. In the above case also, the assessee had obtained his share on partition before his marriage and, on his marriage, had claimed the status of Hindu undivided family. His claim was rejected on the ground that “until a son is born the status of the assessee would continue to be that of an individual. However, the High Court ruled otherwise and upheld the contention of the assessee that once HUF property always HUF property”

HUF without Females -A Single male coparcener without a female member does not constitute a HUF. The only way by which a single coparcener can constitute a HUF is to marry a woman. He and his wife would constitute a HUF. Premkumar Vs. CIT (1980) 121 ITR 347 (All.)

Wife in a HUF - For Example, Mr.A / Mrs.A / Mr.B (Son) / Mr.C Daughter of a HUF, then Mrs. A wife of Mr.A is called a member only and not a coparcener. Hence, she cannot ask for partition but when the property is partitioned, she will get an equal share as that of a coparcener. Wife, not being a coparcener obviously cannot become a karta .

Widow in a HUF – With the passing of the HIndu Succession Act, 1956, widow has been designated as class 1 heir to male Hindu dying intestate. In case of sole surviving coparcener having only a wife but no issue the widow is entitled to succeed to the entire estate of her deceased husband, if he died intestate. The entire interest of the deceased in coparcenery will be part of the estate passing on the death of such person. Bhariben S. Jhaveri Vs. CED (1999) 238 ITR 995 (Guj.). When a Hindu Widow adopts a male heir, the HUF would be constituted by the Hindu widow along with the adopted son. C. Krishnaprasad Vs. CIT (1974) 97 ITR 493 (SC). After the Hindu Succession Act’s amendment in 2005, even widows of predeceased sons are now legally entitled for inheriting the deceased’s property even if they had remarried.

Females and Gift - A Female member (Wife) can gift her property so as to constitute it as HUF Property. CIT Vs. M. Balasubramanian (1990) 182 ITR 117 (Mad.)Daughters are now coparceners. Hence, now, they can throw their individual assets into Family Hotch Potch subject to the provisions of Sec.64(2).