Showing posts with label Legal. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Legal. Show all posts

Thursday, April 23, 2015

Appointment of Company Secretary

Whole-time Company Secretary

As per Companies Act 2013 every company should appoint a whole time company secretary whose paid up share capital is not less than Rs. 5.00 Crores.

A whole time Company secretary of a company can be appointed as a non executive Director of another company. However a Company secretary can not be appointed as whole-time company secretary of another company.

A whole time Company secretary can be appointed as a non-executive director of the same company provided there are more than two directors in the company.


Secretarial Audit Report

As per sub-section (1) of section 204 of the Companies Act 2013 every company that attracts the below listed criteria should carry out a Secretarial Audit and submit the Secretarial Audit Report in form No.MR.3

  1. Every public company having a paid-up share capital of not less than Rs.50 crores or
  2. Every public company having a turnover of not less than Rs.250 Crores

Thursday, March 12, 2015

Inter-corporate Loans and Investments, Loans to employees

Companies Act 2013

section 186 of Companies Act 2013 governs loans, investments and guarantees by a company. Section 186 provides that a company may give loans or provide security/guarantee up to 60% of its (paid up capital + free reserves + securities premium) or 100% of (free reserves + securities premium), whichever is higher. For transactions exceeding these limits, approval of members is required to be sought by way of a special resolution.

on 10th March 2015, Ministry of Corporate Affairs clarified that loans and/or advances made by the companies to their employees, other than the Managing or Whole time directors (which is governed by section 185) are not governed by the requirements of section 186 of the Companies Act, 2013, if it is in accordance with the condition of services to all employees and are also in accordance with the remuneration policy, in cases where such policy is required to be formulated. Due to this clarification now a Company is not required to maintain a register of loans given to its employees in the format MBP2 and does not disclose the details of loans given to its employees in the Directors report as specified u/s 186(9)

Companies Act 1956
The new provisions of section 372A (1956) is applicable only to Public Limited Companies and provide for a combined limit of sixty percent of the paid up share capital and free reserves (which term includes reserves free for distribution as dividend including the amount in the securities premium account) or one hundred percent of free reserves whichever is higher, for grant of loan (which term includes debentures) to any other body corporate, giving of any guarantee or provision of security in respect of a loan to or by any body corporate and acquisition of securities (which term includes shares, debentures, bonds and other marketable securities, etc.) of any other body corporate by way of subscription, purchase or otherwise. These powers are given to the board of a company by the statute .The scope of section 372A is much larger than the erstwhile section 372. Needless to say that there must a basic provision in the memorandum/articles of a company authorizing the board to make inter-corporate loans and investments.However, in exceptional circumstances, the board may provide guarantee without the previous authorization of shareholders. The Board needs to take approval of shareholders in the immediately succeeding meeting of members.

Conditions

  1. No loan, provision of guarantee or security or investment can be made unless the resolution sanctioning the same is passed at a meeting of the board with the consent of all the directors present at the meeting and with the prior approval of the public financial institution where any term loan is subsisting. However, prior approval of the financial institution is not required, if the aggregate of the investments made, loan granted, guarantees given or security provided together with the proposals in this regard does not exceed 60% of the limit referred to above, provided there is no default in repayment of loan or interest thereon.
  2. No loan can be given to any body corporate at a rate of interest lower than the prevailing bank rate.
  3. If a company has defaulted in the matter of public deposits under section 58A of the Act, such a company is prohibited from availing of the provision in section 372A of the Act. This is a temporary restriction, as the prohibition does not apply when the default under section 58A is made good.
EXCEPTIONS

The regulatory provisions of section 372A are not applicable in the following cases : -

  1. to any loan made, any guarantee given or any security provided or any investment made by a banking or insurance company or a housing finance company in the ordinary course of their business or to a company established with the object of financing industrial enterprises or of providing infrastructural facilities;
  2. to a company whose principal business is the acquisition of shares, stock, debentures or other securities;
  3. to a private company unless it is a subsidiary of a public company;
  4. to any investment made in rights issue;
  5. to any loan made, any guarantee given or security provided to or acquisition of shares by a holding company in its wholly owned subsidiary.



Thursday, June 27, 2013

Foreigner as Director in Indian Company and his appointment as director

The foreign nationals or foreign citizen or Non-Resident Indians residing abroad can be appointed as a Director on the Board of Indian companies whether public listed or unlisted or private. A foreign body corporate having 100% subsidiary company in India may nominate all its Directors of the subsidiary Indian company who may be foreign nationals. A foreign director may be appointed as whole time director (executive director) or non whole time director (non – executive director). Procedures relating to appointment of foreign directors under Companies Act are given below.
Under Section 2(13) of the Companies Act, 1956, Director includes any person occupying the position of Director be whatever name called.  In view of this, a foreign national can be appointed as Director in the companies registered in India as per Companies Act 1956.
1. To become a Foreign Director he is required to obtain Director Identification Number (DIN) . For applying DIN,   Permanent Account Number (PAN) from the Indian Income Tax department is compulsory. Before appointment of director, the Director has to apply for DIN.
2. In the case of foreign nationals, the recent color photograph of the director, Pass-port and proof of residence and the affidavit ( format of affidavit is available in MCA web site under DIN 1 )  have to be notarized from the respective country and by applying in Form DIN 1, the Director Identification Number can be obtained on-line. In case of
Foreign Director, the supporting documents can also be attested by Company secretary in full time employment / CEO / Managing director of the Indian company in which he / she proposed to be a director.
3. Affidavit by the applicant to be executed on non judicial stamp paper and duly notarised. It is a mandatory attachment.
4.  In case of foreign applicant, address proof should not be older than 1 year from the date of filing of the E form.
5. Passport number is mandatory for foreign nationals. Foreign nationals shall select the nationality as declared in the passport.
6. Father’s name proof is not required in the case of foreign nationals / NRIs.
7. In case of proofs which are in languages other than Hindi / English, the proofs should be translated in Hindi / English from professional translator carrying his details (name, signature, address) and seal. In the case of foreign nationals, translation done by the notary of home country is also acceptable.
All the forms required to be filed under the Companies Act are filed through MCA website through the digital signature. In view of this the Foreign director is required to have one digital signature with his PAN number encrypted so as to enable him to file the returns with Income tax authorities on behalf of the company.
The Private Limited Companies are required to have a minimum of 2 Directors and Public Limited Companies are required to have a minimum of 3 Directors under the Companies Act.  It is quite possible that all the Directors of the company may be foreign nationals and they run the business through the persons of Indian nationals appointed by them in India.  The Companies Act does not prohibit holding Board meetings abroad. Similarly, it is also having the provision for conducting Board meetings through video –conference subject to adherence to the circulars issued by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs in this regard from time to time. In view of this, it is obvious that a company can have all the Directors consisting of foreign nationals or foreign citizens and there is no prohibition that only Indian Directors should be on the Board of Indian companies.
In the case of companies incorporated in Singapore, at least one Director should the resident of Singapore.  But, no such nationality restriction is applicable for the companies incorporated in India.
Further, a Director belonging to China or Thaiwan who may not be expert in English and hence a person may also become the Director of Indian company without knowing any Indian languages.  What is required is business acumen and also help from others to understand business language in India.
The person proposed to be entered into as Director shall give his consent to act as a Director of the Indian company in writing. This is mandatory in case of a public limited company but now-a-days as a good corporate governance practice, the consent of the proposed appointee director is obtained for private limited companies also. As a measure of caution, this consent may also be notarized in the respective country along with the other documents for obtaining Director Identification Number. This becomes absolutely necessary especially when the Form 32 is required to be certified by a professional and he may have a level of comfort if notarized documents are attached to vouch for the documents belonging to the appointee as he may not be knowing the foreign national personally.
Appointment of Directors is a power which is exercised by the members but once DIN has been obtained the board of directors can pass a resolution for appointing the foreign director by way of an additional director to meet urgent business needs. In addition Form 32 has to be filed with Registrar of Companies with in 30 days for the appointment of director. . And once Form 32 is approved the director’s name will appear in the ‘view signatory details’ in MCA website. At the next Annual general meeting however, the person appointed as Additional director by the Board has to be re-appointed as a Director by the members.
Foreign directors can be paid sitting fees for attending the board meetings even if they are attending the meetings by video conference. In addition to this directors in public limited companies may be also paid commission permitted under sec 309 of the Companies Act. If they are not in the  whole time employment of the company they may be paid commission 1 % of the net profits of the company if the company has a managing director or a whole time director or a manager; 3 % of the net profits of the company in any other case. Sec 309 is not applicable to private limited companies and directors of the private limited companies may be paid commission on the net profits of the company without any restriction.
Under the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999, appointment of a foreign national as a director on  the board of directors of an Indian company does not require the approval of Reserve Bank of India [RBI]

Reserve Bank has also granted general powers to an Indian company to make payment in rupees towards sitting fees or commission or remuneration and travel expenses to and from and within India to its non-whole time director who is resident outside India and is on a visit to India for the company’s work.

Tuesday, February 24, 2009

Limited Liability Partnership

The Limited Liability Partnership (abbreviated as LLP) has elements of partnerships and corporations. It is a partnership in which all partners are limited partners. In an LLP one partner is not responsible or liable for another partner's misconduct or negligence. This is an important difference from that of a limited partnership. In an LLP, all partners have a form of limited liability for each individual's protection within the partnership, similar to that of the shareholders of a corporation. However, unlike corporate shareholders, the partners have the right to manage the business directly. As opposed to that, corporate shareholders have to elect a board of directors under the laws of various state charters. The board organizes itself (also under the laws of the various state charters) and hires corporate officers who then have as "corporate" individuals the legal responsibility to manage the corporation in the corporation's best interest. An LLP also contains a different level of tax liability than a corporation.

 

Limited liability partnerships are distinct from limited partnerships, in that limited liability is granted to all partners, not to a subset of non-managing "limited partners." As a result the LLP is more suited for businesses where all investors wish to take an active role in management.

 

The Limited Liability Partnership Act 2008 has been notified in the official Gazette of India on Januay 9, 2009. ] But the relevant rules have not been notified as yet and are in preparation so the Act has not been fully implemented. The Minister of Corporate Affairs is striving hard to get the first LLP in India be incorporated on 1st April 2009. The Parliament of India has passed the Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) Bill 2008. Lok Sabha (Lower House) granted its assent to the Bill on December 12, 2008 which was earlier passed by the Rajya Sabha (Upper House). The salient features of the LLP Act, 2008 are as under:-

 

1. The LLP has an alternative corporate business vehicle that would give the benefits of limited liability but allows its members the flexibility of organizing their internal structure as a partnership based on an agreement.

 

2. The LLP Act does not restrict the benefit of LLP structure to certain classes of professionals only and would be available for use by any enterprise which fulfills the requirements of the Act.

 

3. While the LLP has a separate legal entity, liable to the full extent of its assets, the liability of the partners would be limited to their agreed contribution in the LLP. Further, no partner would be liable on account of the independent or un-authorized actions of other partners, thus allowing individual partners to be shielded from joint liability created by another partner’s wrongful business decisions or misconduct.

 

4. LLP shall be a body corporate and a legal entity separate from its partners. It will have perpetual succession. Indian Partnership Act, 1932 shall not be applicable to LLPs and there shall not be any upper limit on number of partners in an LLP unlike an ordinary partnership firm where the maximum number of partners can not exceed 20.

 

5. The taxation of LLPs shall be addressed in the Income Tax Act, 1961 which regulates taxation of all form of entities.

 

6. Provisions have been made for corporate actions like mergers, amalgamations etc.

 

7. While enabling provisions in respect of winding up and dissolutions of LLPs have been made, detailed provisions in this regard would be provided by way of rules under the Act.

 

8. The Act also provides for conversion of existing partnership firm, private limited company and unlisted public company into a LLP.

 

9. Nothing Contained in the Partnership Act 1932 shall effect an LLP.

 

10. The Registrar of Companies (Roc) shall register and control LLPs also.

 

11. The governance of LLPs shall be in electronic mode in the successful model of the present

(Extracted from Ministry of Corporate Affairs Portal)




Sunday, February 22, 2009

Stamp Paper in whose name?

A stamp paper purchased in the name of some one can not be used by some other person who is not a party to the contract. u/s 34 of the Bombay Stamp act 1958 clearly states that ".....such stamp paper is purchased in the name of one of the parties to the instrument..."
If in case a stamp paper is not in the name of either party to any agreement the document shall not be considered as evidence in the court of law.



Wednesday, July 30, 2008

Foreign currency convertible bonds (FCCBs)

Primarily FCCBs have a fixed tenure, they are convertible on the
option of the issuer or investor, as the case may be and are either
interest-bearing or in case they are interest-free or low rate, a
premium on redemption is payable if not converted. Its a debatable issue whether the FCCBs are to classified as Debentures or not.

Wednesday, April 16, 2008

Annual Genarl Meeting - Ordinary Business

Ordinary Business
  1. To receive, consider and adopt the Audited Balance Sheet as at __/__/__ , the Profit and Loss Account for the year ended as on that date, and the Report of the Directors and Auditors thereon.
  2. To declare Dividend.
  3. To appoint a Director in place of Mr. x, who retire by rotation and being eligible offers himself for re-appointment.
  4. To appoint Statutory Auditors of the Company to hold office from the conclusion of the ensuring Annual General Meeting till the conclusion of the next Annual General Meeting and to authorise the Boar of Directors to fix their remuneration.